148039 items (122329 unread) in 107 feeds
: Somewhere, chart guru Edward Tufte is squirming: This site's homages to pop culture come in the form of perverted infographics. From the map indicating which countries a Flock of Seagulls deem "so far away" (Iran) to a bar graph illustrating the possibilities at the Hotel California (checking out: 100 percent; leaving: 0) and a flowchart for deciding what game console to buy (pivotal question: Do you have any friends?), GraphJam will give you newfound respect for the awesome power of Microsoft Excel.
: The closest Chick-fil-A is 45 miles from Wired's offices, so we can't easily enjoy its superlative chicken sandwich. Good thing McDonald's has hatched the Southern Style Chicken Sandwich, a feat of culinary reverse engineering that astonished even staffers from below the Mason-Dixon line with its similarity to the Chick-fil-A original. And there's a Golden Arches right down the street. Yum.
: Bust it! Two decades after launching seminal rappers like Young MC, LA label Delicious Vinyl is back with this collection of old-school gems reworked by the likes of Eminem and Peaches — who electrifies Tone-Lôc party anthem "Wild Thing." Not feeling Hot Chip's take on the Pharcyde? Use the included instrumental tracks to make your own rmxx.
: All hail Anglo-Franco pop! Having endured the death of both bandmate Mary Hansen and the alt-rock '90s, the reigning royals of postmodern electrolounge return. Eschewing forays into droning avant interludes, Chemical Chords showcases Stereolab at its shortest and sweetest — as the purveyor of pure '60s-tinged bliss. Light up a Gitane, swoon with your sweetheart, and imagine you're drifting among Godard's nouveau stars.
: Normally a 47-inch LCD with full 1080p resolution and a 120-Hz refresh rate is thicker than Finnegans Wake. Not this $4,699 supermodel. At 1.5-inches, the UT47X902 is heroin-chic thin, with a video processor that boosts the frame rate from the standard 24 fps to a gorgeous 28 fps. But why does such a beauty have such an ugly moniker?
: Truly fit for a player, these '90s-style kicks are sure to be a hot property when they hit stores (and eBay) in late August. Advance to Go, drop $85, and you'll soon be walking on Park Place.
: Architect John Lautner's insane engineering, space-age designs, and Los Angeles backdrops have been catnip to filmmakers. Chemosphere, his 1960 flying- saucer house that sprouts out of the Hollywood Hills, played a supporting role in Body Double, while other Lautner homes stole scenes in Diamonds Are Forever and The Big Lebowski. Through October 12, these ingenious buildings get their close-up in this exhibition at LA's Hammer Museum.
: The bon mots from Cody, the Oscar-winning writer of Juno, keep coming, this time via Twitter. Her stream of consciousness — "I'm at the Denver airport eating a Pizza Hut grease mattress because I clearly hate myself" and "I went with 'That's a cut!' instead of just 'Cut'; I've always favored the conversational approach" — should tide you over until her next project, The United States of Tara, debuts on Showtime next year.
: Kids don't understand you? Send them to film summer school via these reissues of '80s cinematic essentials. Perhaps if they spend a weekend watching Airplane!, Ferris Bueller's Day Off, and Fatal Attraction (among others), they'll grok your familiarity with jive, nostalgia for "Twist and Shout," and fear of keeping a pet rabbit. Plus: Each disc includes a bonus CD with songs from A-ha and Erasure. Roger, roger.
: The Robot Chicken guys got carte blanche from George Lucas to make this 23-minute stop-animation spoof of the Star Wars trilogy. And for good reason: The DVD extras alone are worth the purchase price, with clips of show cocreator Seth Green acting out sketches and countless behind-the-scenes shots of the cast and crew goofing off.
1790: Samuel Hopkins of Vermont gets the very first U.S. patent. It covers a process for making potash and pearl ash (potassium carbonate).
Under the Articles of Confederation, inventors had applied to state legislatures to obtain monopolies on the use of their inventions. But Article I, Section 8 of the new U.S. Constitution empowered Congress to "promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries."
Many inventors petitioned and lobbied the first session of the First Congress in 1789 for patents and copyrights, but in the midst of setting up a whole new government, Congress took no action on any of them. At President Washington's urging, Congress passed a patent law the next year, and the president signed it into law April 10 -- seven weeks before Rhode Island ratified the Constitution to become the 13th state.
The new law directed patent applicants to file a petition with the secretary of state. He, with the secretary of war and attorney general would grant a patent if they found "the invention or discovery sufficiently useful and important." The application required a written description, drawings and, if practical, a model of the invention. These needed to be sufficient to allow a skilled workman to make and use the invention. Thus, the public would benefit when the patent expired after 14 years.
Complete application and document fees for a patent ran $4 to $5 (roughly $100 in today's money) depending how lengthy your specifications were: You had to pay a copying charge of 10 cents per 100 words, because the patents for carbon paper, photography, photocopying and optical scanning were yet to be applied for. (Today's U.S. patent fees, by the way, start at a bargain $75 for a basic application, but rapidly jump into the thousands with fees for search, examination, documents and maintenance.)
Hopkins got his patent at New York City (then the national capital) July 31, complete with signature of President Washington. It covered a method of making potash and pearl ash by burning wood ashes a second time before dissolving them to extract potash. Potash and pearl ash were important ingredients in making glass, china, soap and fertilizer.
The cabinet officers who made up the patent board, or Commissioners for the Promotion of the Useful Arts, were busy men. Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson, for one, found many applications to be of minor importance. The board, in fact, issued only two more patents in 1790: one to Joseph S. Sampson for manufacturing candles, and the other to Oliver Evans for flour-milling machinery.
The potash process also received the first Canadian patent. The Governor General in Council awarded the patent in 1791 to Hopkins and Angus MacDonnel, a Scottish soldier stationed in Quebec City.
Although Hopkins received the first U.S. patent, it wasn't Patent No. 1. That's because the government issued 9,957 patents before starting a numbering system July 13, 1836. On that occasion, U.S. Patent No. 1 went to John Ruggles of Maine for a traction wheel for steam locomotives. Ruggles happened to be chairman of the Senate Committee on Patents. Two years later, the Senate investigated him for alleged corruption regarding a different patent case. He was exonerated.
Source: The Patent Office Pony, by Kenneth W. Dobyns

Also on Portfolio
NFL Streaming Deal: Misunderstanding the Web?
China's Booming, Lucrative Art Market
Subscribe to Portfolio magazineSecretive and publicity shy, David E. Shaw made billions of dollars using fantastically complex computer algorithms to trade on Wall Street.
Now this former computer scientist at Columbia University-turned-tycoon is about to finish the most powerful supercomputer in history. Not to make a killing on the stock market, but to solve some of the trickiest problems in biology: How the molecules that comprise "life" function and interact at the most basic level.
It may seem like a James Bond movie: mysterious billionaire-genius designs megacomputer to probe life's secrets. Will he perhaps tinker with them, too, in a nefarious scheme to dominate the world by creating enhanced life forms or bio-silicon superbeings?
There's no sign that Shaw is going super-villain. Nor does he need to, considering the practical and potentially profitable uses for his megacomputer.
Knowing more about the complex interactions inside us could lead to better and more efficacious drugs, and to develop computer models that can simulate what happens even at the atomic level of life. It could lead to new ideas for developing computers and other machines based on cells and molecules.
Shaw's device, which he's named "Anton" in homage to pioneering microbiologist Anton van Leeuwenhoek, might also take humans several steps closer to having a schematic of how life works at its most elemental levels.
Several years ago, Shaw stepped down from the day-to-day management of his derivatives firm, D.E. Shaw and Company—which in June 2008 was managing upwards of $39 billion in investments.
He became chief scientist of his own computer laboratory, D.E. Shaw Research, home of the team making Anton.
Characteristically, Shaw has been mostly mum about Anton, referring the inquisitive to a technical paper on the project in the journal Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery.
His computer uses the massively parallel computing technology that Shaw helped develop at Columbia in the 1980s. Anton simultaneously runs 512 specialized processors called application-specific integrated circuits.
Unlike other supercomputers that have more general-use applications, including weather forecasting, these processors are specifically designed to calculate the three-dimensional characteristics of molecules.
Shaw's team could use Anton to solve one of the most perplexing mysteries of molecular life: how proteins, the building blocks of life, each acquire a distinctive three-dimensional shape that allows them to perform millions of functions in a living organism.
Proteins, which include enzymes, hormones, and the collagen in bones and skin, are made in cells according to instructions from DNA. They're strands of amino acids bunched up like wads of string into distinctive shapes and held together by subtle physical forces that are still poorly understood.
Current supercomputers, including IBM's BlueGene/L and Stanford University's Folding@home (which uses legions of idle laptops to increase computing power), can take thousands of hours to simulate the folding of a single protein. Even then, these computers can create simulations of functions in molecules that last only a billionth or a millionth of a second. Scientists must then validate the findings.
Anton could run simulations going up to 1,000 times longer, allowing scientists to get much closer to what really happens when, say, a protein folds. "If you can do a thousand times longer, real proteins come into play," Shaw reportedly said in a lecture at Stanford in 2006.
The more that scientists know about proteins and other critical molecules in the human body, the more precise they can be when developing drugs.
"He's making a big step forward with this," Benoit Roux, a biophysicist at the University of Chicago, told the New York Times.
Roger Brent, director of the Molecular Sciences Institute in Berkeley, California, suggested in the Times article that scientists may not know what such a powerful computer is capable of until they use it.
He pointed out that the original Anton—Van Leeuwenhoek, who perfected the microscope in Holland in the 17th century—didn't know that protozoa and other single-cell organisms existed in pond water until he trained his newfangled lenses on a sample.
Shaw also is a major investor in Schrödinger, a chemical and bio-physical simulation software business that could benefit from Anton's new technology.